nQuorate
Log In
Built by life sciences market research practitioners

Simulate how physicians will respond - before the actual fieldwork

nQuorate is a market research simulation platform powered by thousands of behaviorally grounded AI digital twins of physicians. It lets commercial, medical, and market research teams test messages, concepts, positioning, and launch materials at a fraction of the time and cost of traditional fieldwork

We’ll run your market research questions live with the panel

Illustrative Live

Study

TPP Testing - 1L non-targetable mNSCLC

Panel

316 HCPs

Medical Oncologists Academic Community US ≥20 monthly mNSCLC patients

LIKELIHOOD TO PRESCRIBE (T2B%)

% rating 4 or 5 on a 1–5 scale for eligible 1L mNSCLC patients

Product X
72%
Product Y
58%

HCP verbatim

Why
Product X’s median PFS advantage and the q3w dosing are what would tip me toward it in a 1L decision.

- Medical Oncologist · Community · US

For 1L mNSCLC I’m watching OS maturity and the tolerability profile - PFS alone won’t move my whole panel.

- Medical Oncologist · Academic · US

In community practice, q3w dosing means fewer chair days - that operational difference shapes my routine choice as much as the efficacy data.

- Medical Oncologist · Community · US

+ 313 more responses available

Study

Message Testing - Severe Uncontrolled Asthma

Panel

408 HCPs

Pulmonologists Allergists Academic Community US

Most motivating message (T2B%)

% rating given message as very or extremely motivating to prescribe Product X

M1Reduction in annual exacerbation rate
31%
M3Lung function improvement (FEV1)
23%
M4Onset / speed of clinical response
18%
M2Oral corticosteroid (OCS) sparing
14%
M5Long-term safety profile
14%

HCP verbatim

Why
Exacerbations are what land my patients in the ED - anything that meaningfully reduces them is the message that moves me.

- Pulmonologist · Academic · US

OCS-sparing is the conversation I have with every steroid-dependent patient - M2 lands hard with those cases.

- Allergist · Community · US

+ 406 more responses available

Study

Core Visual Aid Testing - 1L mNSCLC

Panel

276 HCPs

Medical Oncologists Board-certified Academic Community US

% selecting page as most critical to story

Five-page detail aid, rank-and-react methodology

Page 1Indication
12%
Page 2MOA
18%
Page 3Efficacy
41%
Page 4Safety
22%
Page 5Dosing
7%

HCP verbatim

Why
The efficacy page is where I decide whether to keep listening - if those numbers don’t hold up, the rest of the conversation doesn’t matter.

- Medical Oncologist · Academic · US

For a new mechanism I flip back to the MOA page - that grounding shapes how I read the efficacy that follows.

- Medical Oncologist · Community · US

+ 274 more responses available

How it works

Three steps from question to insight

  1. 01 Step

    Design your study

    Upload your own survey, or describe your objective and let AI draft one for you, following life sciences market research conventions.

    A

    Upload your survey

    .docx · .pdf

    SUA_message_test_survey.docx

    8 questions · 12 messages detected

    Parsed
    • Q1Doctor, rate the following messages on how motivating you find them to prescribe ...
    • Q2Why did you rate [highest-rated message] as the most motivating?
    • Q3Doctor, rate the following messages on how believable you find the claims made by ...
    • +5 more questions
    Or
    B

    Draft your survey

    AI agents
    Your stimuli· 12 unbranded messages

    “Build a message-test survey for these 12 messages - novel SUA biologic, US.”

    AI drafting your survey4 metrics1–7 rating+ rationale
  2. 02 Step

    Choose your panel

    Select your respondents from thousands of behaviorally grounded AI digital twins - filtering on demographic, behavioral, and attitudinal traits to match the panel to your study.

    Panel

    Illustrative
    Selected316 HCPs
    Pulmonology Allergy / Immunology ≥20 SUA pts/mo Biologic prescribers Academic + Community

    +300 more matching AI digital twins in panel

  3. 03 Step

    Get decision-ready insights

    Run the simulation and get comparative results, key drivers, and presentation-ready findings on a dashboard. Test alternatives and ask follow-ups against the same panel - without commissioning new research.

    Insights · Message Testing

    Export

    Most motivating (T2B%)

    M1 · 31%

    M1
    31%
    M3
    23%
    M4
    18%
    M2
    14%
    M5
    9%
    M6
    5%
    +6 more messages
    62%

    Top driver segment

    Academic pulmonologists

    T2B lift +18 pts vs. community

    Why M1 won

    % of HCPs citing

    • ED admissions are top concern
      73%
    • Patient-actionable metric
      58%
    • Aligns with GINA guideline framing
      41%

    Recommendation

    M3
    M1+M3

    Test a hybrid M1 + M3 variant

    Tighter FEV1 framing projected to lift T2B

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

  • nQuorate’s HCP digital twins are engineered utilizing proprietary behavioral decision models. These models synthesize published clinical guidelines, formulary constraints, historical prescribing data, and demographic variables to accurately simulate physician decision-making across distinct specialties, sub-focuses, and geographies.

  • nQuorate is designed for the early, iterative, directional studies where speed matters most - concept testing, message refinement, TPP stress-testing, segmentation hypotheses. For decisions requiring statistically powered sample sizes, traditional fielded studies remain the standard. The intended workflow is to use nQuorate to converge fast, then field the final study.

  • Our approach is to benchmark twin responses against held-out fielded studies and measure directional agreement. Current performance benchmarks demonstrate strong directional agreement when tested against publicly available research studies.

  • The platform currently supports comprehensive coverage across the United States. Expansion into other markets, including the EU5 and Asia, is actively in the development pipeline.

  • Enterprise-grade compliance is integrated into the platform's foundation. Operations are conducted strictly without storing HCP Personally Identifiable Information (PII). The infrastructure mandates stringent data residency protocols and role-based access controls, architected to seamlessly align with standard enterprise IT and procurement requirements, including Single Sign-On (SSO) and comprehensive audit logging.

  • Pricing models are structured around an initial proof-of-concept phase to demonstrate platform capabilities. Subsequent enterprise licensing is tailored to match organizational scale and specific research requirements.

Enterprise Pilot Program

Bring your research questions - We’ll run it live with the panel

See your own question answered before you commit to anything